Hi, Oliver.
Thank you for compiling this extensive list of questions. I see the effort and intention behind it, and I recognize the importance of discussing leadership, accountability, and the future direction of the TYPO3 Association.
However, I’ve chosen not to respond to each question individually. The format and tone reflect a very specific mindset — one that feels more focused on control and evaluation than mutual understanding. I don’t believe that kind of framing leads to meaningful dialogue.
Enforcing the Code of Conduct is not optional. It’s the foundation of any healthy community. When manipulative or dominating behavior is tolerated — especially when it hides behind intellectual justifications or moral superiority — it does more damage than any technical disagreement ever could. If elected, I will take a clear stance: Boundaries must be respected and consequences must follow — no matter how clever, experienced, or entitled anyone thinks they are.
Nonviolent Communication (NVC) is a valuable concept — but only if it is based on empathy and humility and applied in real life conversations. Without that foundation, it can be turned into a weapon: Used to pressure others, silence disagreements, or hide personal dysfunction behind moral language. That’s not communication — it’s control disguised as care.
To restore lasting trust, I will advocate for a truly independent ombudsperson — outside all boards, teams, and paid roles. Elected by the entire community, not appointed by internal politics or the mere formation of a team. Because neutrality can’t be claimed — it has to be earned.
This is the kind of leadership I stand for: principled, protective, and focused on people — not on dogma.